![]() We have five deadlines throughout our submission process: Hella Early Deadline (June 2nd, 2023), Early Deadline (June 29th, 2023), Regular Deadline (September 22nd, 2023), Late Deadline (October 20th, 2023), and Extended Deadline (November 3rd, 2023). Should an entry use this code without meeting the necessary criteria, it will be disqualified without refund. ![]() Georgia screenwriters are eligible to receive a 50% off discount code by emailing Please allow up to 7 business days for a response particularly when approaching a submission deadline.Īt least one author must reside in the state of Georgia during the time of entry. Any submission outside of that page range will be disqualified without refund.ĭo you offer discounts for Georgia screenwriters? Short Film Screenplays can be between 5-40 pages in length. Supplementary materials include, but are not limited to: concept summaries, character descriptions, and future episode summaries. Supplementary materials are not required for Pilot Screenplays, and though the competition cannot guarantee that any supplementary materials will be reviewed, you may include supplementary materials in your submission PDF or email them to. Any submission outside of that page range can be disqualified without refund. Pilot Screenplays can be 10-70 pages in length. What are the differences in submission categories?įeature Film Screenplays can be 70-130 pages in length. ![]() All screenplays must be submitted in PDF form via either Coverfly or FilmFreeway. Screenplays may be submitted through either Coverfly or FilmFreeway.Ĭan I submit a physical/paper screenplay? By excluding AI material from those definitions, the guild proposal would protect writers from losing a share of credit or residuals due to the use of AI software.For any question(s) not answered here or in our submission Rules & Terms on Coverfly or FilmFreeway, please email. Those definitions are key to determining credit and residual compensation in the guild contract. The guild’s tweets say something else, referring to how AI material is “used” rather than how it is “considered.” The tweets say that AI material cannot be “used” as source material and that AI cannot generate covered “literary material.” The proposal states only that AI material - if used - will not be considered as literary or source material. The entirety of WGA proposal reads: “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SIMILAR TECHNOLOGIES: Provide that written material produced by artificial intelligence programs and similar technologies will not be considered source material or literary material on any MBA-covered project.” The subsequent tweets, however, differ from the language of the proposal. The first tweet sums up the intent of the proposal, which is to regulate AI in such a way to preserve writers’ working standards. #WGAStrong □1/7- Writers Guild of America West March 22, 2023 The WGA’s proposal to regulate use of material produced using artificial intelligence or similar technologies ensures the Companies can’t use AI to undermine writers’ working standards including compensation, residuals, separated rights and credits. If a screenplay is based on source material, then it is not considered an “original screenplay.” The writer may also get only a “screenplay by” credit, rather than a “written by” credit.Ī “written by” credit entitles the writer to the full residual for the project, while a “screenplay by” credit gets 75%.īy declaring that ChatGPT cannot write “source material,” the guild would be saying that a writer could adapt an AI-written short story and still get full “written by” credit. “Source material” refers to things like novels, plays and magazine articles, on which a screenplay may be based. If an AI program cannot produce “literary material,” then it cannot be considered a “writer” on a project. ![]() “Literary material” is a fundamental term in the WGA’s minimum basic agreement - it is what a “writer” produces (including stories, treatments, screenplays, dialogue, sketches, etc.). Those terms are key for assigning writing credits, which in turn have a big impact on residual compensation. The WGA proposal states simply that AI-generated material will not be considered “literary material” or “source material.” It’s not yet clear whether the AMPTP, which represents the studios, will be receptive to the idea. The guild’s proposal was discussed in the first bargaining session on Monday with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. The proposal does not address the scenario in which an AI program writes a script entirely on its own, without help from a person. It appears to be intended to allow writers to benefit from the technology without getting dragged into credit arbitrations with software manufacturers. In effect, the proposal would treat AI as a tool - like Final Draft or a pencil - rather than as a writer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |